To聽assess new requirements from the standpoint of how they will affect mission, agency leaders must answer and act on questions like,聽how聽will聽environmental, safety, economic and social considerations聽integrate聽into daily operations? And,聽more聽importantly, what can聽realistically聽be accomplished without negatively impacting mission聽outcomes聽and services?
Due to聽our聽status as a trusted partner across聽government, our clients asked聽us聽to review the draft EO聽to聽help them聽evaluate the聽proposed language聽along those lines, determine聽if there were areas that聽still聽needed to be better defined and elaborated,聽and聽delineate聽how聽the聽new聽policy and its mandates聽differed from relevant preceding聽EOs.聽
Our review team included mission and policy subject matter experts in climate change, renewable energy, waste management, sustainable procurement, emissions reductions, and electric vehicles.
To determine how the draft language would impact client missions, we reviewed agency processes and datasets and consulted with federal program managers to establish mission-performance baselines, estimate current agency performance, and conduct analyses based on the Administration鈥檚 proposed goals. We also compared聽baseline agency performance against current annual goals and proposed outyear goals to determine if current processes and requirements would be sufficient to meet the new goals or if additional steps would need to be taken.
In areas where the EO provided unclear instructions or may have negatively impacted government missions, 蘑菇视频 Allen helped clients draft questions and suggestions to submit to the Administration addressing their concerns.
蘑菇视频 Allen鈥檚聽broad federal footprint and聽deep well of expertise in聽climate science and policy聽positioned聽us聽to聽help clients聽from different agencies sync up on solutions to similar challenges, and to devise solutions that balanced聽mission and operations considerations with Administration goals.聽
